Fans eager to buy College Football 26 Coins and dive into the game’s Dynasty mode have been met with a frustrating reality: the transfer portal, a key feature meant to mirror the chaos and excitement of modern college football, is deeply flawed and undermines the realism that players crave.

The transfer portal in College Football 26 was marketed as a game-changer, promising thousands of athletes entering the portal each year and giving players a chance to rebuild their teams with experienced talent. However, the system’s implementation has left much to be desired. Even with every setting maxed out to encourage transfers, and with coaching builds tailored for transfer recruiting, players find themselves unable to even talk to most available prospects. In one high-profile example, a playoff-winning Colorado program with upgraded prestige could only speak to a single four-star transfer, with zero three-star players showing any interest.

This lack of access isn’t just a gameplay annoyance—it’s a blow to the authenticity of the college football simulation. In real life, successful programs with strong coaching staffs and recent playoff appearances are magnets for transfer talent. The game, however, often ignores these factors, making it impossible for players to replicate real-world strategies like Deion Sanders’ transfer-heavy rebuild at Colorado.

The root of the problem appears to be the game’s reliance on “deal breakers”—specific criteria that, if not met, prevent any interaction with a player. While this system is meant to add depth, it ends up creating bizarre and unrealistic situations. Elite players routinely transfer from powerhouse schools to much smaller programs simply because of a single matching play style, disregarding factors like program prestige, recent success, or even positional need.

Moreover, the coach abilities designed to boost transfer interest seem ineffective. Even with two coaches maxed out in defensive back recruiting, a team might find no secondary players interested in transferring. This disconnect between coaching investment and recruiting results is both illogical and demoralizing for players who spend time building their staff and strategy.

The inconsistency is further highlighted by how some underperforming teams, like a one-star Temple squad, suddenly become transfer magnets, while more successful programs are left out in the cold. This randomness erodes the sense of agency and progression that Dynasty mode is supposed to offer.

For College Football 26 to live up to its promise of realism, EA must overhaul the transfer portal system. The current approach not only frustrates players but also breaks the immersion that is central to sports simulation games. Until these issues are fixed, even those ready to buy College Football 26 Coins and invest in their programs will find the experience lacking the authenticity that drew them to the game in the first place.

Read more: CFB 26 Ultimate Team Quicksell Coins & Training Values